A COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE OF RADIOGRAPHY STUDENTS ON COMPUTER BASED (ELECTRONIC EXAMINATION) AND WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS [A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITY OF MAIDUGURI]

ABSTRACT

Table of Content


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover page
Title page   
Approval page   
Certification page
Examiners page  
Declaration page
Dedication page 
Acknowledgement page
Table of content  
Abstract   
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1    background of the study   
1.2    Statement of research problem  
1.3    Objectives of the study
1.3    Hypothesis   
1.4    Significance of the study   
1.5    Scope of the study   
1.6    Limitation of the study   
1.7    Definition of terms  
CHAPTER TWO: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
2.0    Literature review  
2.1    History  
2.2    Paper-pen based exam
2.3    Computer based exam
2.5    Comparism
2.6    over view of paper-pen examination and computer based examination
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1    Study design   
3.2    Source of data   
3.3    Study population   
3.4    Sample size   
3.5    Sampling technique   
3.6    Instrument of data collection   
3.7    Inclusion criteria  
3.8    Exclusion criteria  
3.9    Data analysis 
3.10    Ethical consideration  
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION
4.1 RESULTS   
CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION, SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
5.1    Discussion   
5.2    Summary of findings 
5.3    Conclusions 
5.4    Recommendations 
5.5    Contribution to knowledge   
5.6    Area for further studies   
Appendices  
References


ABSTRACT

TITLE: A comparison of performance of radiography students on computer based (electronic examination) and written examinations: a case study of university of Maiduguri.
OBJECTIVES: To compare academic performance differences among computer based (e-exams) and paper-pen examination in some selected courses; Rad 201,Rad 331,Rad 431,Rad 531 in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 academic sessions and to determine the students attitude towards e-examination.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: The research design adopted for this study is a descriptive survey method. A quota sampling and simple random sampling techniques were used to administer the questionnaires to 171 radiography students (45 students each from part 2, 3 and 4 while 36 from part 5) and the whole questionnaires were retrieved.The research was conducted using a structured and open ended questionnaire designed to assess participants demographic profile, their perception on CBE, comparison between CBE and PPE, and physical structure/facilities. SPSS version 16.0 (IBM, US, NEW YORK) was used to analyse the data where descriptive statistics; such as, frequency, mean and percentage were generated. Also chi-square was used to compare the differences in performance between CBE and PPE.
RESULTS: The results show that the performance on paper-pen exam is higher in the four courses ; Rad 201,Rad 331,Rad 431 and Rad 531 which was observed with failure rate of 16.3%, 9.3%,1.9% and 0.0% with average of 49.27, 53.33, 55.02 and 54.83 respectively during 2013/2014 academic session while the same courses in 2014/2015 after the introduction of electronic exam(computer based exam CBE ) in the four courses has 42.9%,11.6%,13.0% and 2.0% with average of 40.16, 29.62,53.09 and 46.42 respectively.
Based on content analysis, the respondents 38(22.2%) strongly agree that performance in CBE was better than the PPE and 51(29.8%) agree, 0(0%) neither agree nor disagree, 67(39.2%) disagree and 15(8.8%) strongly disagree to the above statement.
CONCLUSION: This research showed that students academic performance is better in written (paper and pen exam) than in electronic exam (e-exam, computer based exam). The students prefer written exam to e-exam mode in radiography department of university of Maiduguri. KEY WORDS: examination, computer base exam, paper and pen exam, attitude

CHAPTER 1


CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.0    BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Examination is an assessment indeed to measure a test-takers knowledge, skills, attitude, fitness or classification in many other topics as defined by wikipedia (Rehmani, 2003). Examination can be either paper-pen or electronic examination (e-exam).
Paper-pen examination may be defined as printed set of questions used to test somebody’s knowledge in an exam (Encarta, 2010). Ayo et al. (2007) defines e- examination as a system that “involves the conduct of examinations through the web or the intranet”. Various examination methods are used in universities and other higher education institutions to assess academic progress for example, paper-pencil-based examinations, assignments, presentations etc. Sim, Holifield, and Brown (2004) identified more than 50 varied techniques used within higher education for assessment purposes; the most commonly used are examinations. Both computer based and written exams have their advantages and disadvantages, the conventional examination is plagued with several pitfalls such as examination leakages, Impersonations, inadequate supervisors, demand for gratification by markers, and the most devastating is the delay and non- release of examination results especially where there are large classes or public examinations.
However, some of the disadvantages associated with computer based assessment, including that Computer crashes are more difficult to resolve than broken pencils. There is the potential that an entire testing session, along with all students’ responses could be lost. Back-up procedures are essential, both in terms of storing student responses and having alternative means to administer the test (Bridgeman, 2009), However computer is also made unsafe for storing official and classified documents in university system and government agencies by computer hackers. A case of hacking in 2015 election was recorded where someone hacked into the INEC website to report results.
The university examinations as a higher education institution make use of both written and electronic forms of exams. The written exams (paper and pen testing or paper based exams) are more subjective when it comes to marking in the lecturers’ perspective while the computer based exam (e-exams or web based assessment) are more objective but ones a correct answer is type set as a wrong answer, it can’t be corrected ones exam starts and at the end of the assessment what you see is what you actually get.
The deployment of e-exams began shortly after the university senate approved the commencement of e-examination as from 2009/2010 academic session for departments that are willing and some departments took their examinations electronically during that session. The Radiography department attempted the use of e-test in 2011 and in 2014/2015 academic session 90% of the courses were more of e-exams and the department adopted it as a tool for assessing students.
Moreover, negative comments from students arouse as a result of dissatisfaction with the type of MCQ’s they answer and the slow nature of the system to proceed to next question which is independent of the timer count down of the exam starting and finishing time which does not allow students to answer all within the time limit.
The researcher observed that student’s poor academic achievement has been recorded where in RAD 201 many students failed after being thought by the same course lecturer, same handouts, same course outline and the same learning environment. The researcher compared the results of RAD 201 in 2013/2014 academic session which was paper and pen examination and found that in a class of 98 students the result distribution was 2A, 9B+, 17B, 21C+, 8C, 14D, 11E, 16F with failure rate 16.3% While the results of the same course RAD 201 in 2014/2015 academic session which was e-exams found that in a class of 116 students the result distribution was 3A, 1B+, 7B, 5C+, 8C, 16D, 34E, 42F with failure rate 36.1% .
In percentage, the written examinations has the following: A(2.0%), B+(9.2%), B(17.3%), C+(21.4%), C(8.2%), D(14.3%), E(11.2%), F(16.3%) While the e-
exams has the following: A (2.58%), B+(0.86%), B(6.02%), C+(4.30%), C(6.88), D(13.76%), E(29.24%), F(36.12%). The aim of the study is to assess the performance difference and perception among radiography students on computer-Based and paper-pen examination.
1.1    STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
It has been observed by the researcher that huge number of students have complained about the e-examination application as an assessment tool following a decline in their academic performances since its inception in 2009/2010 in UNIMAID.
1.2    OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
1.    To compare academic performance differences among computer based (e-exams) and paper-pen examination in some selected courses; Rad 201, Rad 331, Rad 431, Rad 531 in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 academic sessions.
2.    To determine the students attitude towards e-examination.
1.3    Hypothesis:
Null hypothesis: states that there is no difference between two population means therefore H0: x1 = x2. Alternate hypothesis: states that there is difference between two means and therefore H1: X1 ≠ X2